of people served
rated by clients
available to help
Minnesota Statute § 609.3751 provides a specific legal pathway for certain individuals facing criminal charges for Nonsupport of Spouse or Child (§ 609.375) to potentially avoid a formal conviction on their record. This statute outlines a form of deferred adjudication or stay of adjudication tailored specifically for nonsupport cases. It allows eligible defendants, typically first-time offenders for this type of charge, to be placed on probation without the court initially entering a judgment of guilt. If the individual successfully completes the probationary period, including adhering to strict conditions like maintaining payments on current support and arrears, the court then discharges the person and dismisses the criminal proceedings entirely, preventing a conviction from ever formally entering their public record.
This statutory mechanism serves a dual purpose. Primarily, it offers a significant second chance, allowing individuals who meet strict eligibility criteria to avoid the severe and lasting collateral consequences of a criminal conviction (particularly a felony nonsupport conviction) that can impact employment, housing, and civil rights. Simultaneously, it strongly incentivizes compliance with court-ordered support obligations. By tying the dismissal of criminal charges directly to the successful execution of a court-approved payment agreement for both current support and past-due amounts (arrears), the statute encourages defendants to become current and remain compliant, benefiting the spouse or child entitled to the support while offering the defendant a path away from a permanent criminal record.
Minnesota Statute § 609.3751 is located in the state’s criminal code, immediately following the statute defining criminal nonsupport (§ 609.375). It does not define a crime but rather sets forth a specific procedural option for courts handling certain nonsupport cases. It details the eligibility requirements for this disposition, the procedures for deferring judgment and imposing probation with specific conditions, the consequences of violating probation, provisions for early dismissal, and the effect of successful completion on the defendant’s record.
609.3751 DISCHARGE AND DISMISSAL.
Subdivision 1. Applicability. A person is eligible for a discharge and dismissal under this section, if the person:
(1) has not been previously convicted of a felony under the laws of this state or elsewhere;
(2) has not been previously convicted of a violation of section 609.375 or of a similar offense in this state or elsewhere;
(3) has not previously participated in or completed a diversion program relating to a charge of violating section 609.375; and
(4) has not previously been placed on probation without a judgment of guilty for violation of section 609.375.
Subd. 2. Procedure. For a person eligible under subdivision 1 who is charged with violating section 609.375, the court may after trial or upon a plea of guilty, without entering a judgment of guilty and with the consent of the person, defer further proceedings and place the person on probation upon such reasonable conditions as it may require and for a period not to exceed the maximum sentence provided for the violation. At a minimum, the conditions must require the defendant to:
(1) provide the public authority responsible for child support enforcement with an affidavit attesting to the defendant’s present address, occupation, employer, current income, assets, and account information, as defined in section 13B.06; and
(2) execute a written payment agreement regarding both current support and arrearages that is approved by the court.
In determining whether to approve a payment agreement under clause (2), the court shall apply the provisions of chapter 518A consistent with the obligor’s ability to pay.
Subd. 3. Violation. Upon violation of a condition of the probation, including a failure to comply with the written payment agreement approved by the court under subdivision 2, clause (2), the court may enter an adjudication of guilt and proceed as otherwise provided in law.
Subd. 4. Early dismissal. The court may, in its discretion, dismiss the proceedings against the person and discharge the person from probation before the expiration of the maximum period prescribed for the person’s probation but may do so only if the full amount of any arrearages has been brought current.
Subd. 5. Dismissal; record.
(a) For purposes of this subdivision, “not public” has the meaning given in section 13.02, subdivision 8a.
(b) If during the period of probation the person does not violate any of the conditions of the probation, then upon expiration of the period the court shall discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against that person. Discharge and dismissal under this subdivision shall be without court adjudication of guilt, but a not public record of it shall be retained by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for the purpose of use by the courts in determining the merits of subsequent proceedings against the person. The not public record may also be opened only upon court order for purposes of a criminal investigation, prosecution, or sentencing. Upon request by law enforcement, prosecution, or corrections authorities, the bureau shall notify the requesting party of the existence of the not public record and the right to seek a court order to open it pursuant to this section. The court shall forward a record of any discharge and dismissal under this section to the bureau which shall make and maintain the not public record of it as provided under this section. The discharge or dismissal shall not be deemed a conviction for purposes of disqualifications or disabilities imposed by law upon conviction of a crime or for any other purpose.
Minnesota Statute § 609.3751 establishes a specific pathway, often referred to as a stay of adjudication or deferred judgment, allowing certain individuals charged with criminal nonsupport (§ 609.375) to ultimately avoid a conviction. This beneficial outcome is not automatic; it requires meeting strict initial eligibility criteria and successfully navigating a distinct procedural process involving probation and mandatory conditions. Understanding these requirements and steps is crucial for anyone hoping to utilize this statutory provision.
Minnesota Statute § 609.3751 itself does not impose penalties; rather, its entire purpose is to provide an eligible individual with a structured opportunity to avoid the penalties associated with a criminal conviction for Nonsupport of Spouse or Child under § 609.375. Successfully completing the probation and conditions outlined in § 609.3751 results in dismissal of the charges without an adjudication of guilt, meaning no criminal sentence (jail, fine) is imposed for that offense.
Think of § 609.3751 as a specific type of probationary deal offered to certain first-time offenders charged with criminal nonsupport (§ 609.375). Instead of immediately convicting the person after they plead guilty or are found guilty, the judge essentially says, “Okay, you meet the strict eligibility rules (no prior felonies or nonsupport issues). I won’t formally convict you yet. Instead, I’m putting you on probation for a set period. If you follow all the rules, especially paying your support according to a court-approved plan and providing financial info, then at the end, I will dismiss this case entirely, and you won’t have this conviction on your public record.” This offers a huge incentive – avoiding a damaging criminal record – in exchange for demonstrated compliance.
However, it comes with significant conditions and risks. The person must agree to this process. They have to provide detailed financial information and, most importantly, work out and stick to a written payment agreement covering both ongoing support and past-due amounts (arrears), which the judge must approve as reasonable based on their ability to pay. If they mess up during probation – especially if they fail to make payments under the approved plan – the deal is off. The judge can then formally enter the conviction for the original nonsupport charge (whether misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony) and sentence them accordingly. It’s a second chance, but compliance is mandatory to achieve the benefit of dismissal.
Sarah is charged with Gross Misdemeanor Nonsupport (§ 609.375, subd. 2) due to being $5,000 in arrears (7 times her $700 monthly obligation). She has no prior felony or nonsupport convictions or diversions. After pleading guilty, her attorney argues for disposition under § 609.3751. The court confirms her eligibility, Sarah consents, and the court defers entering judgment. Sarah is placed on probation for one year with conditions including providing a financial affidavit and executing/following a court-approved plan to pay current support plus an additional amount towards arrears each month.
This illustrates the entry process: eligibility verification, post-plea timing, defendant consent, deferred judgment, probation, and mandatory conditions including the crucial payment agreement tailored to her situation.
Following the scenario above, Sarah diligently complies with all probation conditions for the full year. She provides the required financial information and makes every single payment required under the court-approved payment agreement, gradually reducing her arrears while staying current on ongoing support. At the end of the year, her probation officer reports full compliance.
Pursuant to § 609.3751, Subd. 5, the court must discharge Sarah from probation and formally dismiss the Gross Misdemeanor Nonsupport proceedings against her without entering an adjudication of guilt. She avoids the conviction. The BCA will maintain a non-public record, but for most purposes (employment, housing), she does not have this conviction on her record.
David is placed on probation under § 609.3751 after pleading guilty to Felony Nonsupport (§ 609.375, subd. 2a) based on duration (>180 days). His court-approved payment plan requires specific monthly payments towards current support and arrears. After six months of compliance, David stops making payments for three consecutive months in violation of the agreement. His probation officer files a violation report.
The court holds a probation violation hearing. David cannot provide a lawful excuse for nonpayment. Under § 609.3751, Subd. 3, the court finds him in violation, revokes the deferred status, enters the adjudication of guilt for the original Felony Nonsupport charge, and proceeds to sentence David according to the felony penalties outlined in § 609.375, Subd. 2a (up to 2 years prison / $5,000 fine). The chance for dismissal is lost due to non-compliance.
Michael is charged with Misdemeanor Nonsupport. He hopes for a § 609.3751 disposition. However, a criminal history check reveals he completed a county diversion program for a previous nonsupport charge five years earlier.
Michael is ineligible for discharge and dismissal under § 609.3751 because he fails to meet the criterion in Subdivision 1, clause (3) (“has not previously participated in or completed a diversion program relating to a charge of violating section 609.375”). Even though he wasn’t convicted previously, participation in the diversion program disqualifies him from this specific statutory relief for the current charge. His case would proceed toward a standard conviction or other resolution.
While the discharge and dismissal option under § 609.3751 offers a valuable opportunity for eligible nonsupport defendants, navigating the process involves several important considerations and potential challenges. Successfully utilizing this statute requires careful attention to eligibility, the terms of probation (especially the payment plan), and strict compliance. Issues can arise regarding qualification, the feasibility of conditions, alleged violations, and the possibility of early dismissal. Addressing these points proactively is key to achieving the desired outcome of avoiding a conviction.
Defense counsel plays a critical role in evaluating eligibility, negotiating the terms of the deferral and payment plan, advising the client on compliance, and responding to any alleged violations. The goal is not just to enter the program but to ensure the conditions are manageable and that the client understands the absolute necessity of adherence to secure the dismissal. Potential pitfalls include unrealistic payment plans, unexpected changes in financial circumstances during probation, or misunderstandings about probation requirements, all of which could jeopardize the chance for dismissal.
Meeting the strict eligibility criteria in Subdivision 1 is the non-negotiable first step. Any ambiguity or dispute regarding prior history must be resolved.
The success of the § 609.3751 disposition often hinges on the reasonableness of the conditions imposed, particularly the payment agreement.
If the prosecutor or probation officer alleges a violation of conditions during the deferral period, swift and effective representation is crucial to potentially preserve the chance for dismissal.
Subdivision 4 allows for dismissal before the full probation term ends, but only under a specific condition.
Its purpose is to allow eligible, first-time offenders charged with criminal nonsupport (§ 609.375) to avoid a formal conviction by successfully completing a period of probation with specific conditions, primarily involving paying support according to a court-approved plan.
No. The defendant must meet strict eligibility criteria (no prior felonies, nonsupport convictions/diversions, etc.), the court must agree to offer this disposition (usually after a plea or finding of guilt but before judgment), and the defendant must consent to the process and its conditions.
A person is eligible only if they have (1) no prior felony convictions, (2) no prior nonsupport convictions, (3) never participated in nonsupport diversion, and (4) never previously received probation without conviction for nonsupport.
If you violate a condition of probation, especially the court-approved payment agreement, the court can revoke the deferred status, enter a formal judgment of guilt for the original nonsupport charge (Misd, GM, or Felony), and sentence you accordingly.
Not entirely. While there is no public conviction record and it doesn’t count as a conviction for most purposes (like employment/housing disqualifications), the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) retains a “not public” record of the discharge and dismissal. This record can be accessed by courts for future sentencing or by law enforcement/prosecutors via court order for investigations.
Generally, no. Standard employment background checks access public conviction records. Accessing the “not public” record under § 609.3751 typically requires a court order, usually sought only by courts, prosecutors, or law enforcement for specific justice system purposes, not general background screening.
Usually, yes. The statute says the court may offer it “after trial or upon a plea of guilty,” but before entering judgment. Most often, it follows a guilty plea made with the understanding that judgment will be deferred contingent on successful probation under this statute.
At a minimum, conditions must include providing a detailed financial affidavit to the support enforcement agency and executing (and complying with) a written, court-approved payment agreement covering both current support and arrears, based on ability to pay.
Yes, § 609.3751 functions very similarly to a stay of adjudication specifically tailored for nonsupport cases. Judgment is deferred pending successful completion of probation.
Its primary benefit is providing a way to resolve the criminal charge without receiving a formal conviction on one’s public record, thus avoiding many of the severe collateral consequences associated with a criminal conviction, provided all conditions are met.
Yes, provided you meet the eligibility criteria in Subdivision 1. The procedure applies regardless of whether the underlying § 609.375 charge is a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony, although the length of probation could potentially be longer for a felony-level offense (up to the maximum sentence of 2 years).
The statute requires the court to approve a payment agreement consistent with the obligor’s ability to pay, applying family law principles (Chapter 518A). It is crucial during the negotiation phase (Subd. 2(2)) to present accurate financial information and advocate for a realistic plan. Agreeing to an unmanageable plan risks violation and subsequent conviction.
No. The eligibility criteria explicitly disqualify anyone who has previously received probation without conviction for nonsupport (§ 609.3751, subd. 1(4)) or participated in a nonsupport diversion program (Subd. 1(3)). It is intended as a one-time opportunity.
Diversion programs often occur before a guilty plea (pre-charge or pre-plea), potentially avoiding court involvement altogether if completed successfully. Section 609.3751 typically occurs after a guilty plea or finding of guilt but before judgment, involving formal court probation. Successful completion of either can result in no conviction, but the process differs. Prior diversion participation makes one ineligible for § 609.3751.
Yes, potentially. Subdivision 4 gives the court discretion to grant early dismissal from probation, but only if the full amount of support arrears has been paid. Paying arrears is necessary but doesn’t guarantee early dismissal; exemplary compliance with other conditions is also usually expected.
Successfully navigating the process outlined in Minnesota Statute § 609.3751 yields a significantly different long-term outcome compared to receiving a formal conviction for criminal nonsupport under § 609.375. The primary advantage lies in avoiding the public record of a conviction, which mitigates many, though not all, potential negative consequences.
The most significant benefit of obtaining a discharge and dismissal under § 609.3751 is the absence of a formal, public criminal conviction for nonsupport. For purposes of background checks commonly used for employment, housing, volunteer positions, and many professional licenses, the individual can truthfully state they were not convicted of the crime. This dramatically improves prospects compared to someone with a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony nonsupport conviction, preserving opportunities that might otherwise be lost. It avoids the immediate disqualification that often accompanies a conviction record.
While dismissal under § 609.3751 prevents a public conviction, it’s crucial to understand it’s not an expungement or complete erasure. Subdivision 5 mandates that the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) retains a “not public record” of the event. This record is specifically designated for use by courts in future proceedings (e.g., determining eligibility for similar programs, sentencing considerations if convicted of a later crime) and can be opened by court order for criminal justice purposes (investigation, prosecution, sentencing). While shielded from general public view and standard background checks, its existence means law enforcement and courts can potentially access this information later under specific circumstances.
The structure of § 609.3751 strongly incentivizes compliance with support obligations. The mandatory court-approved payment plan for current support and arrears (Subd. 2(2)) ties the dismissal directly to financial responsibility. The possibility of early dismissal only upon full payment of arrears (Subd. 4) provides further motivation. In the long term, this process can help individuals get back on track with their support payments, benefiting the receiving spouse or child while simultaneously allowing the payer to avoid the downward spiral often caused by a criminal conviction. It offers a path toward financial resolution alongside legal resolution.
Ultimately, § 609.3751 embodies a legislative choice to offer a genuine second chance to individuals who meet the strict definition of a first-time nonsupport offender. It recognizes that people can make mistakes or face temporary circumstances leading to nonpayment, and provides a structured way for them to rectify the situation without suffering the lifelong consequences of a criminal conviction. By successfully completing probation and fulfilling payment obligations, the individual demonstrates responsibility and earns the significant benefit of case dismissal, allowing them a better opportunity to move forward productively. However, the one-time nature of this opportunity underscores its significance.
The first critical step when a client faces nonsupport charges under § 609.375 is determining if they qualify for the discharge and dismissal pathway under § 609.3751. This requires more than just the client’s recollection; it demands a thorough investigation of their complete criminal history. An attorney diligently obtains records from Minnesota and potentially other states to verify conclusively the absence of any prior felony convictions, prior nonsupport convictions (or similar offenses), prior nonsupport diversion program participation, or prior nonsupport stays of adjudication. Confirming eligibility under Subdivision 1 is essential before even considering this dispositional option with the prosecutor or court, as ineligibility renders it unavailable.
If a client is eligible for § 609.3751, securing this favorable disposition often requires negotiation. An attorney advocates with the prosecutor and the court for the client’s acceptance into this program, highlighting their eligibility and commitment to compliance. A crucial part of this negotiation involves the mandatory written payment agreement under Subdivision 2(2). The attorney gathers detailed financial information from the client (income, expenses, assets, debts) to argue for a payment plan covering current support plus arrears that is genuinely manageable and sustainable based on the client’s verified ability to pay, consistent with Chapter 518A principles. Agreeing to an unrealistic plan approved by the court sets the client up for failure and eventual conviction.
Once § 609.3751 disposition is granted, the client must strictly adhere to all probation conditions to earn the dismissal. An attorney plays a vital role in ensuring the client fully understands every requirement: the importance of timely payments under the agreement, the necessity of keeping the financial affidavit updated if circumstances change, reporting requirements to probation, and any other conditions imposed. The attorney also explains the severe consequences of any violation, as outlined in Subdivision 3 – namely, the revocation of the deferred status and the entry of a formal conviction. Clear guidance helps the client navigate probation successfully and avoid pitfalls that could jeopardize the dismissal.
Despite best efforts, alleged probation violations can occur. If a client on § 609.3751 probation faces an allegation of violating conditions (e.g., missed payments, failure to report), immediate legal representation is critical. The attorney investigates the alleged violation, gathers evidence to potentially refute the claim or demonstrate mitigating circumstances (like a temporary, unforeseen hardship that might constitute a lawful excuse for a brief lapse), and represents the client at the probation violation hearing. The goal is to persuade the court not to revoke the deferred status and enter a conviction, possibly by arguing the violation wasn’t willful, seeking reinstatement on probation, or negotiating a modified payment plan to address the issue while preserving the path to dismissal.
