of people served
rated by clients
available to help
Minnesota law includes specific statutes addressing situations where criminal conduct results in harm to an unborn child. Statute 609.268, titled “Injury or Death of Unborn Child in Commission of Crime,” creates felony liability when an unborn child dies, or suffers great or substantial bodily harm (and is born alive), as a result of the defendant committing another underlying crime. This statute essentially attaches additional, serious penalties when certain criminal acts lead to these tragic outcomes for an unborn child, even if harming the child was not the primary intent of the underlying crime. It operates similarly to felony-murder or felony-assault rules but applies specifically to unborn victims and covers a defined range of predicate offenses.
The statute is divided into two main subdivisions. Subdivision 1 deals with situations where the commission of a qualifying felony or certain specified misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor offenses causes the death of an unborn child. Subdivision 2 addresses cases where the commission of a qualifying felony or different set of specified offenses causes great or substantial bodily harm to an unborn child who is subsequently born alive. Both subdivisions establish separate felony offenses with significant potential penalties, distinct from the penalties for the underlying crime itself. Understanding which underlying crimes trigger liability under this statute and the specific exclusions is critical for analyzing such charges.
Minnesota Statute 609.268 establishes criminal liability for causing injury or death to an unborn child when that injury or death occurs during the commission of another separate criminal offense. This law aims to hold individuals accountable for the harm caused to an unborn child as a direct consequence of their engagement in other criminal activity, even if the harm to the child was unintended. Subdivision 1 specifically addresses causing the death of an unborn child while committing a qualifying felony (excluding certain homicide/assault felonies) or specific misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor offenses like fifth-degree assault, domestic assault, or mistreatment/neglect crimes. A conviction under this subdivision is a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison.
Subdivision 2 addresses situations where the commission of a qualifying felony (again, with certain exclusions) or specific mistreatment/neglect offenses results in great or substantial bodily harm to the unborn child, who is then subsequently born alive. This covers severe non-fatal prenatal injuries caused by the defendant’s underlying criminal conduct. This subdivision is also a felony, carrying penalties of up to 10 years imprisonment. Importantly, for both subdivisions, liability stems from the commission of the predicate crime; the state must prove the defendant committed the underlying offense, and that this offense caused the death or injury to the unborn child. The statute explicitly excludes certain felonies (like murder or specific assault statutes) to avoid redundant charges for the same core conduct.
The specific legal provisions defining the offenses of causing injury or death to an unborn child during the commission of another crime, including the applicable underlying offenses, exclusions, and penalties, are detailed in Minnesota Statute § 609.268, subdivisions 1 and 2.
609.268 INJURY OR DEATH OF UNBORN CHILD IN COMMISSION OF CRIME.
Subdivision 1. Death of unborn child.
Whoever, in the commission of a felony or in a violation of section 609.224, 609.2242, 609.23, 609.231, 609.2325, or 609.233, causes the death of an unborn child is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or to payment of a fine not more than $30,000, or both. As used in this subdivision, “felony” does not include a violation of sections 609.185 to 609.2114, 609.221 to 609.2231, or 609.2661 to 609.2665.
Subd. 2. Injury to unborn child.
Whoever, in the commission of a felony or in a violation of section 609.23, 609.231, 609.2325 or 609.233, causes great or substantial bodily harm to an unborn child who is subsequently born alive, is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both. As used in this subdivision, “felony” does not include a violation of sections 609.2112 to 609.2114, 609.221 to 609.2231, or 609.267 to 609.2672.
To secure a conviction under either subdivision of Minnesota Statute 609.268, the prosecution must prove several distinct elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The core concept involves linking harm to an unborn child directly to the defendant’s commission of a separate underlying criminal offense. The specific elements differ slightly between Subdivision 1 (death) and Subdivision 2 (injury), particularly regarding the outcome for the child and the required level of harm in Subdivision 2. Proving the commission of the underlying qualifying offense is fundamental to both.
A conviction under either subdivision of Minnesota Statute 609.268 results in a felony record and carries significant potential penalties, including substantial prison time and fines. These penalties are imposed in addition to any penalties received for the underlying predicate crime itself, reflecting the additional harm caused to the unborn child. The maximum penalties differ between the two subdivisions based on the outcome (death vs. injury).
If convicted under Subdivision 1 for causing the death of an unborn child in the commission of a qualifying crime, a person “may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or to payment of a fine not more than $30,000, or both.” This felony conviction carries a substantial maximum sentence reflecting the severity of causing death.
If convicted under Subdivision 2 for causing great or substantial bodily harm to an unborn child (subsequently born alive) in the commission of a qualifying crime, a person “may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.” While still a serious felony, the maximum penalty is lower than for Subdivision 1, reflecting the non-fatal outcome for the child. Sentencing for both subdivisions follows the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines based on offense severity and criminal history.
Minnesota Statute 609.268 operates as an enhancement or separate charge when other criminal behavior tragically results in the death or serious injury of an unborn child. It doesn’t require intent to harm the child; rather, liability flows from the commission of the underlying offense (a qualifying felony or specific misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor) and its causal connection to the harm suffered by the fetus. Think of it as holding someone responsible for the foreseeable, albeit perhaps unintended, consequences of their criminal actions when those consequences involve an unborn child.
The statute carefully excludes certain underlying crimes (like murder, manslaughter, specific assaults) to prevent defendants from being unfairly punished twice for essentially the same conduct under different statutes. It focuses on situations where the primary crime is something else – like theft, burglary, drug offenses, neglect, or lower-level assaults – but that crime leads to the death or serious injury of an unborn child. The distinction between Subdivision 1 (death before birth) and Subdivision 2 (injury followed by live birth) is critical for determining the applicable charge and penalties.
An individual commits residential burglary (a felony). While inside the home, they unexpectedly encounter a pregnant resident. Startled, the burglar shoves the resident forcefully to escape, causing her to fall. The trauma from the fall leads to the death of the unborn child before birth. The burglar did not intend to cause death but committed burglary (a felony not excluded under Subd. 1).
This could lead to charges under 609.268, Subd. 1. The elements are: commission of a qualifying felony (burglary) and causing the death of the unborn child during that commission. Because burglary isn’t excluded and led to the death, the defendant faces up to 15 years under this statute, separate from the burglary penalty.
An individual commits misdemeanor Domestic Assault (Minn. Stat. § 609.2242) against their pregnant partner, involving pushing and hitting. The physical trauma inflicted during this assault causes the death of the unborn child. Domestic Assault (609.2242) is one of the specific misdemeanors listed as a predicate offense under Subdivision 1.
Here, even though the underlying crime was a misdemeanor, the resulting death triggers felony liability under 609.268, Subd. 1. The elements are: commission of a qualifying listed offense (609.2242) and causing the death of the unborn child during that commission. The defendant faces up to 15 years for the death resulting from the misdemeanor assault.
An individual is engaged in manufacturing illegal drugs (a felony) in their apartment, using volatile chemicals. Due to unsafe practices, an explosion or fire occurs. A pregnant neighbor in an adjacent apartment suffers injuries from the blast or smoke inhalation that cause substantial bodily harm (e.g., temporary substantial impairment requiring significant medical care) to her unborn child. The child is subsequently born alive.
This scenario could fit under 609.268, Subd. 2. The elements are: commission of a qualifying felony (felony drug manufacturing, not excluded under Subd. 2), causing substantial bodily harm to the unborn child during that commission, and the child being subsequently born alive. The defendant faces up to 10 years under this statute for the injury caused by their underlying felony drug crime.
A caregiver is responsible for a vulnerable adult who is pregnant. The caregiver commits Criminal Neglect under Minn. Stat. § 609.233 by knowingly depriving the pregnant woman of necessary food, shelter, or health care, resulting in severe malnutrition or untreated medical conditions. This neglect causes great bodily harm (e.g., permanent organ damage) to the developing fetus. The child is subsequently born alive with these conditions.
This situation could also lead to charges under 609.268, Subd. 2. Criminal Neglect (609.233) is listed as a qualifying predicate offense. The neglect caused great bodily harm to the unborn child, who was born alive. The caregiver faces up to 10 years under this statute for the harm resulting from their criminal neglect, in addition to penalties for the neglect itself.
Defending against charges under Minnesota Statute 609.268 requires a two-pronged approach: first, challenging the prosecution’s ability to prove the underlying predicate offense, and second, challenging the causal link between that offense and the alleged injury or death of the unborn child. Since liability under 609.268 is entirely dependent on the commission of another qualifying crime, if the defense can defeat the underlying charge, the 609.268 charge automatically fails.
Furthermore, even if the underlying crime is proven, the prosecution must still establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s actions during the commission of that crime directly caused the specific outcome for the unborn child (death for Subd. 1, or GBH/SBH followed by live birth for Subd. 2). Challenging this causal connection, disputing the level of harm (for Subd. 2), or contesting the live birth element (for Subd. 2) are crucial defense strategies. An attorney must carefully analyze both the predicate crime and the resulting harm to build the strongest defense.
Because conviction under 609.268 hinges on the commission of a separate predicate offense, any valid defense to that underlying charge also serves as a defense to the 609.268 charge.
The prosecution must directly link the commission of the predicate crime to the death or injury of the unborn child.
For charges under Subdivision 2, the prosecution must prove either great bodily harm (GBH) or substantial bodily harm (SBH).
Subdivision 2 specifically requires the child to be subsequently born alive.
This statute adds felony liability when an unborn child dies (Subd. 1) or suffers great/substantial bodily harm and is born alive (Subd. 2) as a result of the defendant committing a separate underlying criminal offense (a qualifying felony or specific misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor). It holds offenders accountable for harm to unborn children caused during other crimes.
No. Liability under this statute generally flows from the commission of the underlying predicate crime. Intent to harm the unborn child is not a required element. If the qualifying underlying crime is committed, and it causes the specified harm to the unborn child, liability under 609.268 can result regardless of intent towards the child.
Most felonies can serve as predicate offenses, except those specifically excluded. Excluded felonies typically include murder, manslaughter, criminal vehicular homicide, and specific assault statutes (both general and against unborn children) to avoid double-charging for the same core conduct. Examples of felonies that could trigger 609.268 include burglary, robbery, theft, arson, felony drug offenses, etc.
Subdivision 1 (death) lists: 609.224 (Assault 5), 609.2242 (Domestic Assault), 609.23 (Mistreatment of Persons Confined), 609.231 (Mistreatment of Residents/Patients), 609.2325 (Criminal Abuse), or 609.233 (Criminal Neglect). Subdivision 2 (injury) lists a narrower set: 609.23, 609.231, 609.2325, or 609.233 (primarily mistreatment/neglect crimes).
The exclusions prevent unfair pyramiding of charges or punishments. For example, if someone commits Murder of an Unborn Child (609.2661), they wouldn’t also be charged under 609.268 for causing death during that same act. The exclusions ensure 609.268 applies when the harm to the unborn child results from a different type of underlying crime.
Subdivision 1 applies when the underlying crime causes the death of the unborn child before birth. Subdivision 2 applies when the underlying crime causes great or substantial bodily harm to the unborn child who is subsequently born alive. The outcome for the child and the level of harm dictates which subdivision applies.
Subdivision 1 (death) carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and/or a $30,000 fine. Subdivision 2 (injury) carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and/or a $20,000 fine. These are felonies.
Yes. A conviction under 609.268 is separate from, and penalties can be imposed consecutively to (added onto), the sentence for the underlying predicate crime (e.g., burglary, domestic assault, neglect).
The statute does not explicitly require knowledge of the pregnancy as an element for liability under 609.268. Liability stems from committing the underlying crime which then causes the prohibited harm to the unborn child, whether the pregnancy was known or not.
Subdivision 2 applies if the underlying crime causes either “great bodily harm” (permanent/protracted serious injury, high probability of death) or “substantial bodily harm” (temporary substantial injury, fracture, specific prematurity if applicable). Medical evidence defines the level of harm.
No. Subdivision 1 applies specifically when the unborn child dies before birth. The “born alive” requirement only applies to Subdivision 2, which deals with non-fatal injuries.
It depends. If the underlying crime involves negligence (like Criminal Neglect, 609.233, listed under both subdivisions), then yes. However, if the underlying act was merely ordinary negligence not amounting to a listed crime or qualifying felony, 609.268 would not apply. Liability hinges on the commission of one of the specified criminal offenses.
Injury or Death of Unborn Child in Commission of Crime is a felony. Under Minnesota Statute 628.26, the statute of limitations for most felonies is three years from the date of the offense. Charges under 609.268 typically must be brought within this timeframe.
Absolutely. Since conviction under 609.268 requires proof that the defendant committed the underlying qualifying crime, an acquittal or dismissal of the underlying charge means the 609.268 charge cannot be sustained.
The statute applies if the harm occurs “in the commission of” the underlying crime, which generally includes attempts. If the defendant attempted a qualifying felony or listed offense, and that attempt caused the death or injury, liability under 609.268 could still attach.
A conviction under either subdivision of Minnesota Statute 609.268 is a serious felony conviction that carries significant and lasting consequences, extending far beyond the potential prison sentence (up to 15 years for Subd. 1, up to 10 years for Subd. 2) and fines. These collateral consequences create long-term barriers and legal disabilities that can permanently alter an individual’s life.
The conviction results in a permanent felony record associated with causing death or serious injury to an unborn child during criminal activity. This leads to the loss of fundamental civil rights, such as firearm possession, and creates substantial obstacles in critical areas like employment and housing. Understanding these enduring impacts is essential when facing charges under this statute.
A conviction under 609.268 establishes a permanent felony record indicating a serious offense involving harm to an unborn child linked to other criminal conduct. Given the nature of the offense (resulting in death or serious injury), this conviction is unlikely to be eligible for expungement under Minnesota law. This record remains publicly accessible indefinitely and will appear on background checks.
This permanent record severely limits future prospects. Employers, landlords, licensing agencies, and educational institutions often screen out applicants with felony convictions, especially those involving violence or resulting in death or serious injury. The specific context of harm to an unborn child can add to the difficulty in overcoming the stigma associated with the conviction.
Under both Minnesota and federal law, any felony conviction results in a lifetime prohibition on possessing firearms or ammunition. A conviction under either subdivision of 609.268 triggers this permanent loss of Second Amendment rights. Attempting to possess a firearm after this conviction constitutes a separate, serious felony offense.
This is one of the most significant and certain collateral consequences of a felony conviction. It impacts rights related to self-defense, participation in shooting sports or hunting, and eligibility for certain occupations.
Securing stable employment with a felony conviction under 609.268 is extremely difficult. Many employers have policies against hiring individuals with felony records, particularly those related to homicide, serious injury, or underlying crimes like burglary, assault, or neglect. This often restricts individuals to low-wage, unstable work and hinders career advancement. Professional licenses are also likely unobtainable or subject to revocation.
Finding safe and affordable housing presents similar challenges. Landlords frequently deny rental applications based on felony convictions, especially those suggesting violence or disregard for safety. Access to public housing assistance may also be limited. These barriers to fundamental necessities create significant obstacles to successful reintegration and stability.
For non-U.S. citizens, a conviction under 609.268, being a serious felony often involving underlying crimes considered aggravated felonies or crimes involving moral turpitude, carries severe immigration consequences. Deportation (removal) from the United States is highly likely following completion of the sentence, with little chance of future reentry.
Other civil rights are also affected. Voting rights are suspended during incarceration and supervised release/parole (though restorable afterward). The right to serve on a jury is typically lost permanently for felony convictions. Holding public office or certain positions of trust may also be barred. The conviction can also impact family law matters, such as child custody disputes.
A critical first step in defending against charges under Minnesota Statute 609.268 involves thoroughly analyzing the alleged underlying predicate crime. An experienced criminal defense attorney will scrutinize whether the prosecution can actually prove the defendant committed that separate felony or specified misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, the attorney must meticulously check the statutory exclusions listed within subdivisions 1 and 2. If the alleged predicate felony is one explicitly excluded by the statute (like murder, manslaughter, or certain assaults), then the 609.268 charge is improper. Identifying a failure to prove the underlying crime or demonstrating that it falls under an exclusion provides a complete defense to the 609.268 charge itself.
Establishing causation is paramount for the prosecution under 609.268 – they must prove the defendant’s actions during the commission of the predicate crime directly caused the death or requisite injury to the unborn child. A defense attorney undertakes a detailed investigation to challenge this link. This often requires collaborating with medical experts to review prenatal records, autopsy reports (for Subd. 1), or postnatal assessments (for Subd. 2). The attorney explores potential intervening causes, pre-existing conditions, or alternative explanations for the harm that are unrelated to the defendant’s alleged criminal conduct. Raising reasonable doubt about whether the predicate crime was the substantial causal factor is a key defense strategy.
When charges are brought under Subdivision 2 (injury), the prosecution must prove great or substantial bodily harm. A defense attorney, often aided by independent medical experts, carefully examines the medical evidence presented by the state. The attorney can challenge whether the documented injuries legally meet the high thresholds for GBH (permanent/protracted serious harm, high probability of death) or SBH (temporary substantial harm, fracture). Arguments might focus on the temporary nature of an injury, the lack of functional impairment, or whether the harm truly qualifies as “substantial” under Minnesota definitions. Successfully arguing the injury level was lower could defeat the Subd. 2 charge, potentially leading to lesser charges if applicable.
Charges under 609.268 add another layer of complexity and significant sentencing exposure on top of the underlying predicate offense. An experienced attorney understands how these charges interact and the potential for consecutive sentencing. The attorney evaluates the strength of the evidence for both the underlying crime and the 609.268 charge, advises the client on the total potential legal jeopardy, and develops a comprehensive strategy. This may involve aggressively defending against both charges at trial or strategically negotiating a global plea agreement that resolves all charges (both the predicate offense and the 609.268 charge) in the most favorable way possible, potentially seeking concurrent sentencing or dismissal of one charge in exchange for a plea on the other.
