of people served
rated by clients
available to help
Arson in the Fifth Degree represents the broadest and least severe classification of intentional arson under Minnesota law. Defined in Minnesota Statutes § 609.5632, this offense addresses situations where an individual intentionally uses fire or explosives to set fire to, burn, or cause the burning of any real or personal property that possesses some value. Unlike higher degrees of arson that often require specific locations (like dwellings or public buildings), particular intents (like defrauding an insurer), or outcomes (like endangering human life), fifth-degree arson serves as a foundational charge for the deliberate act of setting fire to property, regardless of its type or location, as long as it has value.
This charge underscores that Minnesota law takes any intentional setting of fire seriously, even when the damage is minor or the property involved is not exceptionally valuable or located in a high-risk area like an apartment building. The core of the offense lies in the deliberate action and the use of fire or explosives. It distinguishes intentional acts from accidental fires or those caused by simple negligence, which might be addressed under different statutes if they result in damage. Understanding the scope of this misdemeanor charge, its elements, potential penalties, and available defenses is crucial for anyone accused under this statute, as even a misdemeanor conviction can carry lasting consequences.
The offense of Arson in the Fifth Degree is specifically codified under Minnesota Statutes § 609.5632. This section of the law outlines the basic elements required to charge someone with the lowest level of intentional arson in the state. It focuses on the intentional use of fire or explosives to damage or destroy any type of property that has some value.
609.5632 ARSON IN THE FIFTH DEGREE.
Whoever intentionally by means of fire or explosives sets fire to or burns or causes to be burned any real or personal property of value is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.
To secure a conviction for Arson in the Fifth Degree under Minnesota Statute § 609.5632, the prosecution is required to prove several key components, known as the elements of the crime, beyond a reasonable doubt. Each element is essential, and the state’s failure to establish even one element means the charge cannot legally stand. These elements define the specific conduct prohibited: the intentional nature of the act, the means employed, the action taken, the type of property affected, and the requirement that the property possess some value. Comprehending these elements is the first step in evaluating the evidence in any fifth-degree arson case.
A conviction for Arson in the Fifth Degree under Minnesota Statute § 609.5632 is classified as a misdemeanor. While this is the least severe category of criminal offense in Minnesota, it still carries potential penalties that can significantly impact an individual’s life. The judge determines the final sentence based on the specifics of the case, the defendant’s prior record, and any mitigating or aggravating factors presented. A misdemeanor conviction also results in a criminal record.
According to § 609.5632, a person convicted of Arson in the Fifth Degree faces the following possible penalties:
Beyond these maximums, a court might also impose probation with various conditions, such as attending counseling (e.g., fire-setter programs), paying restitution for any damages caused, completing community service, or adhering to no-contact orders if applicable. Even without significant jail time, the conviction itself creates a public criminal record.
Arson in the Fifth Degree serves as Minnesota’s baseline charge for intentional fire-setting that damages property. Its broad scope means it can apply in many situations that don’t meet the requirements for more serious arson charges. The key ingredients are always the same: someone intentionally uses fire or explosives, and as a result, some form of real or personal property that has value is burned or set on fire. It doesn’t matter if the property is inside or outside, whether it’s a building or an object, or if the value is large or small – as long as it has some value and the act was intentional.
Think of it as covering the deliberate act of burning almost anything of value that isn’t covered by the more specific, higher-degree arson statutes. If someone intentionally sets fire to property, and it doesn’t involve a dwelling, a public building (for fourth degree), doesn’t foreseeably endanger life, isn’t done to defraud an insurer, and doesn’t meet other specific criteria for degrees one through four, then fifth-degree arson might be the applicable charge. It addresses the fundamental wrong of intentionally using fire to damage or destroy another’s (or sometimes even one’s own) property.
A person is walking through a city park late at night and decides, perhaps out of boredom or anger, to set fire to the contents of a metal park trash receptacle using a lighter. The fire burns the trash inside and scorches the interior of the metal can before park maintenance discovers it the next morning. The trash can itself belongs to the city and has functional value.
This act could lead to a charge of Arson in the Fifth Degree. The trash can is personal property (owned by the city) and has value. The act of setting the fire was intentional, using fire (a lighter). Since it involves intentional burning of property with value and doesn’t readily fit higher degrees (not in a specific building type, likely no life endangered, etc.), § 609.5632 could apply.
Someone decides to dispose of old personal mail and documents by burning them in a pile in their backyard. While doing so, the fire gets slightly out of control and scorches a portion of their wooden fence adjacent to the burn pile. A neighbor observes this and calls the authorities due to the smoke and proximity to the fence.
Even though the person was burning their own mail, the fire intentionally set caused burning damage to the fence, which is real property with value. The act of starting the fire was intentional. If the prosecution can show the fence was burned as a direct result of the intentional fire-setting (even if damaging the fence wasn’t the primary goal, the intentional setting of fire caused it), this could arguably fit the elements of fifth-degree arson because real property of value was burned by an intentional fire.
An individual uses a makeshift torch or a concentrated lighter flame to intentionally char their initials into the surface of a wooden utility pole located on a public sidewalk. The act doesn’t compromise the pole’s structure significantly but leaves permanent burn marks constituting damage. The utility pole is real or personal property (depending on classification) owned by the utility company and clearly has value.
This scenario involves the intentional use of fire to burn or char property of value (the utility pole). It’s a deliberate act causing damage through burning. Since a utility pole isn’t typically a dwelling or public/multi-unit building as defined for higher degrees, and life wasn’t likely endangered, Arson in the Fifth Degree under § 609.5632 appears applicable due to the intentional burning of valued property.
Someone finds a pile of discarded tires on a vacant lot and intentionally sets them ablaze using gasoline and a match, perhaps for thrills or to try and get rid of them. The tires burn intensely, creating significant smoke. The tires, even if discarded, likely have some residual value (e.g., for recycling or disposal fees) and belong to someone (the property owner where they were dumped, or potentially the dumper). The vacant land itself (real property) might also be scorched.
This action fits the criteria for fifth-degree arson. It’s an intentional act using fire (and an accelerant) that causes personal property (tires) and potentially real property (land) of value to burn. Assuming no higher degrees apply (e.g., no buildings involved, no life endangered), the intentional destruction by fire of property with value falls squarely within the definition of § 609.5632.
Even though Arson in the Fifth Degree is a misdemeanor, the accusation is serious, and mounting a defense is crucial. The prosecution carries the full burden of proving every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. A criminal defense attorney’s role involves carefully examining the state’s evidence and identifying weaknesses or contradictions. Potential defenses often focus on negating the required intent, questioning whether the property actually had value, challenging the identification of the accused, or demonstrating that the damage wasn’t caused by fire or explosives as defined by law.
Developing an effective defense requires a detailed review of all available information, including police reports, witness accounts, photographs of the alleged damage, and any physical evidence collected. An attorney can assess whether the evidence truly supports each element of the charge under § 609.5632. For instance, was the fire truly intentional, or could it have been accidental? Did the allegedly burned item genuinely possess value, or was it worthless? Was the defendant correctly identified as the person responsible? Successfully challenging even one required element can lead to charges being dismissed or an acquittal.
The core of fifth-degree arson is that the act must be intentional. If the fire was not started purposefully, the charge cannot be sustained. This is often a key area for defense.
The statute explicitly requires that the real or personal property burned must be “of value.” If the item destroyed or damaged had no ascertainable value, an essential element of the crime is missing.
This defense asserts that the prosecution has charged the wrong person or cannot prove the defendant committed the act.
The statute specifies the means must be “fire or explosives.” If the property damage occurred through other means, this charge is inappropriate.
As the broadest and lowest level of intentional arson, it can be charged in various situations involving minor intentional fire-setting that don’t meet the criteria for higher degrees. Its frequency might depend on local prosecutorial practices, but it exists to cover intentional acts causing damage via fire to any property of value.
The statute doesn’t define a minimum monetary threshold. Generally, if property has any economic worth, functional purpose, or if someone would pay something for it, it has value. Sentimental value alone might be harder to legally establish as “value” for this statute, but items with sentimental value often also have some minimal objective value (e.g., a photograph has value as paper/image). The prosecution needs to show some value.
Not necessarily. Burning trash might violate local ordinances or potentially the negligent fire statute if it causes damage recklessly. For fifth-degree arson, the act must be intentional burning of property of value. If you burn your own worthless trash safely, it’s likely not arson. If you intentionally burn someone else’s trash container (which has value), or if the trash itself has some value and belongs to another, it could potentially fit.
Yes, slight scorching or charring can be sufficient to meet the “sets fire to or burns” element. The property does not need to be significantly damaged or destroyed. Any visible effect of intentionally applied fire or explosives causing alteration by burning could technically satisfy this element.
Yes. The statute covers burning “any” real or personal property of value. While ownership might be relevant in some contexts (e.g., insurance fraud, higher degrees), intentionally setting fire to your own property (like a shed, fence, or even personal items) can still constitute fifth-degree arson if it has value, as the law prohibits the dangerous act of intentional fire-setting itself.
The key difference is intent. Fifth-degree arson requires intentional setting of fire to property. Negligent fire involves causing a fire to burn or spread to property through negligence or recklessness (a gross disregard of a substantial risk), often resulting in property damage or bodily harm. Arson requires purpose; negligent fire requires carelessness resulting in harm.
It certainly can. Even though it’s a misdemeanor, an arson conviction involves dishonesty and potential danger, which are red flags for many employers. It will appear on background checks and may need to be disclosed on applications, potentially leading to job loss or difficulty finding employment, especially in fields requiring trust or safety clearances.
While the maximum sentence includes up to 90 days in jail, actual jail time depends heavily on the case facts and the defendant’s record. For first-time offenders with minor damage, probation without jail might be more common. However, jail time remains a possibility, especially if circumstances are aggravated or the defendant has prior offenses.
Probation is a frequent outcome for misdemeanor convictions, including fifth-degree arson, particularly for individuals without a significant criminal history. Probation allows the person to remain in the community under court supervision and specific conditions, avoiding or minimizing jail time if those conditions are met.
Both can involve damage to property. Fifth-degree arson specifically requires the damage to be caused intentionally by fire or explosives. Criminal Damage to Property (Minn. Stat. § 609.595) covers intentionally causing damage by any means (not just fire/explosives) or tampering creating a risk of damage. If fire is used, arson is usually the more specific charge, but CDP could potentially apply as well or instead, depending on the evidence and prosecutorial choice. The penalties for CDP vary based on the value of the property damaged.
Yes, misdemeanor convictions are potentially eligible for expungement in Minnesota after a waiting period (typically two years after completing the sentence/probation) and meeting other statutory requirements. Expungement seals the court record from public view, which can significantly help with background checks for housing and employment. However, eligibility and granting of expungement are not automatic and require filing a petition with the court.
Yes, it is strongly recommended. A misdemeanor conviction still creates a permanent criminal record with potential long-term consequences. An attorney understands the specific elements the state must prove for arson, can identify defenses (like lack of intent or value), negotiate with the prosecutor for better outcomes (dismissal, lesser charge, favorable sentence), and guide you through the court process to protect your rights.
Putting the fire out quickly might mitigate the damage and could potentially be a factor considered in sentencing or negotiations. However, the crime of Arson in the Fifth Degree is technically complete once you intentionally set fire to or burn property of value, even if the burning is brief. The act of extinguishing it doesn’t automatically negate the commission of the offense itself if all elements were initially met.
For the basic charge of fifth-degree arson, the specific motive (anger, boredom, revenge, curiosity) doesn’t change the elements the prosecution needs to prove – primarily the intent to set the fire. However, motive can be very relevant during sentencing, where a judge might consider the reasons behind the action when deciding on an appropriate penalty. Certain motives, like intent to defraud, could potentially elevate the charge to a higher degree of arson.
Typically, no, if done legally and safely. However, if a campfire is intentionally set in a way that burns property of value (e.g., intentionally setting it directly on someone else’s property, or using it to intentionally ignite nearby vegetation or items belonging to another), it could potentially fit the elements. More commonly, campfire issues might lead to negligent fire charges if carelessness causes unintended spread and damage.
While Arson in the Fifth Degree is a misdemeanor, underestimating its long-term impact would be a mistake. A conviction, even at this level, signifies an intentional act involving fire, which carries a significant stigma. This criminal record entry can create persistent obstacles in various areas of life long after any court sentence is completed.
A conviction for fifth-degree arson creates a permanent public criminal record. This record will surface during routine background checks conducted for employment, housing applications, volunteer positions, professional licensing, and even certain educational programs. The presence of an arson conviction, regardless of degree, often raises serious concerns about an individual’s judgment, trustworthiness, and potential risk to safety and property, making it harder to pass these essential checks.
Securing and maintaining employment can become more difficult with an arson conviction. Employers, particularly those in fields involving security, finance, childcare, healthcare, or positions of trust, may be unwilling to hire someone convicted of intentionally setting a fire. Disclosure requirements on applications can force individuals to reveal the conviction, often leading to disqualification. Even for unrelated jobs, the stigma associated with arson can make employers choose other candidates, limiting career opportunities and advancement.
Landlords frequently use background checks to screen potential tenants. An Arson in the Fifth Degree conviction can be a significant barrier to finding rental housing. Property owners may worry about the risk to their property and the safety of other tenants, leading them to deny applications from individuals with such convictions. This can restrict housing options, potentially forcing individuals into less desirable or stable living situations.
For non-citizens residing in the United States, a conviction for Arson in the Fifth Degree can have severe immigration consequences. Arson, even at the misdemeanor level, is often considered a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT) under immigration law. A CIMT conviction can lead to deportation (removal), denial of re-entry into the U.S., denial of applications for permanent residency (green card), or denial of naturalization (citizenship), depending on the specific circumstances and the individual’s immigration status.
Even misdemeanor charges like Arson in the Fifth Degree proceed through a formal court system with specific rules, procedures, and deadlines. Attempting to navigate this system alone can be confusing and disadvantageous. A criminal defense attorney familiar with Minnesota’s misdemeanor courts understands the process, from the initial arraignment and pre-trial hearings to potential plea negotiations or trial. They can ensure all paperwork is filed correctly, deadlines are met, and the defendant understands each stage of the proceedings, providing crucial guidance and reducing the stress associated with facing criminal charges under § 609.5632.
A primary function of a defense attorney is to critically evaluate the evidence the prosecution intends to use to prove Arson in the Fifth Degree. This involves obtaining and reviewing police reports, witness statements, photographs, fire investigation findings (if any), and any alleged admissions by the defendant. The attorney looks for weaknesses: Was the required intent truly proven, or was it an accident? Did the property actually have value? Is the evidence linking the defendant to the fire reliable? Was evidence collected legally? By meticulously scrutinizing the state’s case, an attorney can identify flaws that may be leveraged for dismissal, acquittal, or a favorable plea bargain.
Based on the investigation and evidence review, a defense attorney identifies all applicable legal defenses to the fifth-degree arson charge. As discussed earlier, this could include lack of intent, the property having no value, factual innocence or misidentification, the damage not being caused by fire or explosives, or violations of the defendant’s constitutional rights during the investigation. The attorney understands how to effectively raise these defenses in court through pre-trial motions (like motions to suppress illegally obtained evidence) or by presenting counter-evidence and cross-examining prosecution witnesses during a trial, aiming to create reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt.
Ultimately, the goal is to achieve the best possible outcome for the client facing charges under Minnesota Statute § 609.5632. A defense attorney works towards this by exploring all avenues. This includes negotiating with the prosecutor for potential charge dismissal, reduction to a non-arson offense, or agreements like a continuance for dismissal or stay of adjudication that might avoid a conviction altogether. If a conviction seems likely, the attorney advocates for the most lenient sentence possible, presenting mitigating factors and arguing against jail time. Having skilled legal representation significantly increases the chances of minimizing the negative consequences of a fifth-degree arson charge.
