of people served
rated by clients
available to help
Minnesota Statute § 609.35 addresses a critical aspect of the response to criminal sexual conduct (CSC) by dictating who bears the financial responsibility for necessary medical forensic examinations and related immediate care for victims. This law mandates that the State of Minnesota, through the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), must cover these costs when the alleged sexual assault occurred within the state. The primary purpose of this statute is to remove financial barriers that might otherwise prevent a victim from seeking timely medical attention and crucial forensic evidence collection following an assault. By ensuring these services are provided at no cost to the victim, the law aims to support victim well-being and facilitate the justice process, regardless of the victim’s financial situation or whether they choose to immediately report the incident to law enforcement.
This statute represents an important protection for individuals navigating the aftermath of sexual violence. It covers not only the forensic examination itself, often performed by a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE), but also associated necessary tests and treatments for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy status determination, and emergency contraception. Significantly, § 609.35 prohibits hospitals and healthcare providers from billing the victim directly for these covered services and places strict conditions on seeking reimbursement from a victim’s insurance. It underscores the state’s commitment to supporting victims and ensuring that the potential cost of an examination does not deter someone from seeking care or preserving evidence that could be vital for a future prosecution, should they choose to pursue one.
Minnesota Statute § 609.35 is codified within the state’s criminal code, chapter 609, which deals with various crimes. However, this specific section does not define a crime but rather establishes the financial framework for covering medical examination costs for victims of criminal sexual conduct occurring in Minnesota. It directs state payment and outlines procedures for billing and reimbursement, ensuring victims are not financially responsible.
609.35 COSTS OF MEDICAL EXAMINATION.
(a) Costs incurred by a hospital or other emergency medical facility or by a physician, sexual assault nurse examiner, forensic nurse, or other licensed health care provider for the examination of a victim of criminal sexual conduct that occurred in the state shall be paid by the state. These costs include, but are not limited to, the cost of the medical forensic examination, associated tests and treatments relating to sexually transmitted infection, and pregnancy status, including emergency contraception. A hospital, emergency medical facility, or health care provider shall submit the costs for examination and any associated tests and treatment to the Office of Justice Programs for payment. Upon receipt of the costs, the commissioner shall provide payment to the facility or health care provider. Reimbursement for an examination and any associated test and treatments shall not exceed $1,400. Beginning on January 1, 2024, the maximum amount of an award shall be adjusted annually by the inflation rate.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the duties, responsibilities, or liabilities of any insurer, whether public or private. The hospital or other licensed health care provider performing the examination may seek insurance reimbursement from the victim’s insurer only if authorized by the victim. This authorization may only be sought after the examination is performed. When seeking this authorization, the hospital or other licensed health care provider shall inform the victim that if the victim does not authorize this, the state is required by law to pay for the examination and that the victim is in no way liable for these costs or obligated to authorize the reimbursement.
(c) The applicability of this section does not depend upon whether the victim reports the offense to law enforcement or the existence or status of any investigation or prosecution.
(d) Requests for reimbursement and supporting documents are private data on individuals as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 12.
Minnesota Statute § 609.35 outlines specific conditions that must be met for the State of Minnesota to be responsible for the costs associated with a medical forensic examination following alleged criminal sexual conduct. This statute doesn’t define elements of a crime but rather establishes the factual prerequisites for state financial liability. Understanding these elements is crucial for victims seeking care, healthcare providers performing examinations, and the Office of Justice Programs administering payments. These requirements ensure the statute’s protections are applied correctly and consistently across the state.
Minnesota Statute § 609.35 primarily imposes financial obligations on the state and establishes rules for healthcare providers regarding billing for sexual assault forensic exams. It does not define a crime or outline criminal penalties for its violation. However, failure by a healthcare provider or facility to comply with the statute’s mandates, particularly the prohibition against billing victims directly, can lead to significant non-criminal consequences. These repercussions stem from violations of state law, healthcare regulations, and professional standards.
If a hospital, clinic, or individual provider disregards the requirements of § 609.35, they could face various repercussions:
These potential consequences underscore the importance for all Minnesota healthcare providers who perform these examinations to be fully aware of and compliant with the billing and payment procedures mandated by § 609.35.
Minnesota Statute § 609.35 provides significant peace of mind for individuals at an incredibly vulnerable time. Its core function is straightforward: if someone experiences criminal sexual conduct in Minnesota and seeks a medical forensic exam (often called a SANE exam or rape kit exam), the State pays for it, not the victim. This removes the worry about receiving a potentially large medical bill for necessary care and evidence collection right after a traumatic event. The law ensures that financial status does not dictate access to this critical service. It covers the specialized exam itself, plus immediate related needs like testing for STIs and pregnancy, and emergency contraception if needed and desired.
Furthermore, the law empowers victims by giving them control over whether their insurance is involved. Hospitals cannot just bill a victim’s insurance; they must get explicit permission after the exam and after explaining that the state will pay regardless. This protects privacy, as involving insurance often generates paperwork (like an Explanation of Benefits) that might go to a parent or spouse, potentially disclosing the assault exam when the victim isn’t ready. The fact that payment is guaranteed even if the victim chooses not to report to the police immediately (or ever) is another crucial element, respecting the victim’s timeline and decisions while still ensuring access to care and evidence preservation.
Following a sexual assault that occurred in Minneapolis, an individual goes to the emergency room at a local hospital. A Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) performs a medical forensic examination, collects evidence, provides testing for STIs, and offers emergency contraception, which the victim accepts. The hospital cannot bill the victim for any of these services.
Under § 609.35(a), because the alleged CSC occurred in Minnesota and the victim received a medical forensic exam and associated care from a hospital/SANE, the costs must be paid by the state. The hospital is required to submit the itemized bill (up to the annually adjusted cap) directly to the Minnesota Office of Justice Programs (OJP) for payment. The victim bears no financial liability for this visit related to the exam.
A college student undergoes a medical forensic exam at a university-affiliated clinic after an assault occurred at an off-campus party in Minnesota. The student explicitly tells the healthcare provider they are not ready to file a police report at this time but wanted the exam for medical reasons and potential future evidence.
According to § 609.35(c), the state’s obligation to pay is completely independent of whether the victim reports the offense to law enforcement. The clinic must still submit the costs to OJP for reimbursement, and the state is required to pay for the covered services up to the cap. The student’s decision not to report does not affect their right to a state-funded examination under this law.
After completing the forensic exam and providing necessary tests, a hospital registration staff member speaks with the victim about billing. The staff member asks, “Would you like us to bill your health insurance for today’s visit?” Before the victim answers, the staff member adds, “You should know that under state law, Minnesota pays for this exam if you don’t authorize insurance billing, so you have no obligation to authorize it or pay anything yourself.”
This interaction complies with § 609.35(b). The provider sought authorization after the exam and provided the required information about the state payment obligation first. If the victim authorizes insurance billing, the hospital can bill the insurer. If the victim declines, the hospital must bill OJP. The choice rests entirely with the informed victim.
A Minnesota resident is sexually assaulted while on vacation in Florida. Upon returning home to Minnesota, they go to their local clinic seeking a medical forensic examination related to the assault that happened out of state.
In this case, Minnesota Statute § 609.35 likely does not apply directly to mandate state payment via OJP. Subsection (a) requires that the criminal sexual conduct “occurred in the state” of Minnesota. Since the assault happened in Florida, the provider cannot bill Minnesota OJP under this specific statute. The victim might explore Florida’s laws regarding exam payment or Minnesota’s general crime victim compensation program for other potential assistance, but § 609.35 funding is geographically limited to offenses within Minnesota.
Because Minnesota Statute § 609.35 establishes specific rights for victims and corresponding obligations for healthcare providers and the state, discussions of “defenses” related to this law often center on ensuring these rights are respected and obligations are fulfilled. It’s less about defending against a charge under § 609.35 (as it defines no crime) and more about how a victim, advocate, or provider might address situations where the statute’s provisions are not being followed, such as cases of improper billing or disputes over covered costs. Understanding these rights and compliance mechanisms is key to realizing the statute’s protective intent.
These situations typically involve administrative or civil remedies rather than criminal defense. For instance, a victim who is improperly billed needs recourse to correct the error. A provider whose valid claim is denied by the state needs a way to appeal or clarify. The statute itself provides the legal basis for these actions by clearly defining who pays (the state), what is covered (exam and associated immediate care), the conditions (CSC occurred in MN), the limits (adjusted cap), the billing procedures (direct to OJP unless victim authorizes insurance), and the independence from police reporting. Asserting these statutory rights is the primary way parties interact legally with § 609.35.
This involves ensuring the victim is not improperly charged for services covered by the statute.
The statute grants victims specific control over whether their private insurance is billed for the exam.
While the state is obligated to pay, disputes can arise regarding eligibility or the amount covered. Providers, often with information from the victim, may need to challenge OJP denials.
The statute protects the privacy of the financial transaction between the provider and the state.
Under Minnesota Statute § 609.35, the State of Minnesota pays for the cost of the medical forensic examination and associated immediate care if the criminal sexual conduct occurred within Minnesota. Payment is administered through the Office of Justice Programs (OJP).
The state payment covers the cost of the medical forensic examination itself, associated tests and treatments for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy status testing, and emergency contraception provided during the examination visit.
Yes, there is a maximum reimbursement amount. The base amount was set at $1,400, but starting January 1, 2024, this cap is adjusted annually for inflation. Healthcare providers must submit claims within the applicable adjusted cap for the year the service was provided.
No. State payment under § 609.35 is not dependent on the victim having health insurance. The state pays regardless of the victim’s insurance status.
No. Hospitals and other providers covered by the statute are prohibited from billing the victim directly for the costs covered under § 609.35. They must bill the State OJP.
No. Section 609.35(c) explicitly states that state payment does not depend on whether the victim reports the offense to law enforcement or on the status of any investigation or prosecution.
Yes. Providers can only bill your insurance if you give explicit authorization after the exam is completed and after they inform you that the state pays otherwise and you aren’t obligated to authorize it. You have the absolute right to refuse authorization.
The criminal sexual conduct must have occurred within the state of Minnesota for the payment provisions of § 609.35 to apply. If the assault happened outside Minnesota, this specific statute does not mandate state payment.
No, § 609.35 specifically covers the costs associated with the initial medical forensic examination and immediate associated tests/treatments. It does not typically cover ongoing medical care or long-term therapy costs, though other victim compensation programs might offer assistance for those.
The Office of Justice Programs is a division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety responsible for administering various justice-related programs, including the payment program for sexual assault examinations under § 609.35.
While the statute doesn’t specify a deadline, providers generally follow standard medical billing timelines. It’s the provider’s responsibility to submit the claim correctly and promptly to OJP for reimbursement.
SANE stands for Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner. SANEs are registered nurses who have received specialized training to provide comprehensive care to sexual assault victims, including conducting medical forensic examinations and collecting evidence.
The statute requires the maximum reimbursement amount ($1,400 base) to be adjusted annually based on the inflation rate, starting January 1, 2024. The Office of Justice Programs likely uses a specific inflation index (e.g., Consumer Price Index) to calculate the new cap each year.
The statute limits state reimbursement to the annually adjusted cap. If a provider’s charges exceed this amount, § 609.35 does not automatically require the state to pay the excess, nor does it permit billing the victim for the difference for covered services. Hospitals often absorb costs above the cap for these specific exams as part of providing the service under the state program guidelines.
Yes, for the services covered under § 609.35 (the forensic exam, associated STI/pregnancy testing/treatment, emergency contraception occurring during that visit), the cost should be entirely covered by the state up to the cap, with no financial liability for the victim.
Minnesota Statute § 609.35, by ensuring state payment for crucial post-assault medical forensic examinations, creates significant positive long-term impacts for victims, the healthcare system, and the administration of justice in criminal sexual conduct cases. These impacts extend beyond the immediate financial relief provided.
The most direct impact is the removal of cost as a barrier to seeking immediate, specialized medical care after a sexual assault. Victims, regardless of their income or insurance status, can access medical forensic exams without fear of personal financial burden. This encourages timely care, which is vital for addressing immediate health concerns (like STIs and pregnancy risk) and for collecting forensic evidence effectively. Over the long term, this contributes to better health outcomes for survivors and ensures that financial circumstances do not dictate access to essential post-assault services provided during the exam visit.
Medical forensic evidence collected during a SANE exam can be crucial for investigating and prosecuting sexual assault cases. By funding these exams, § 609.35 supports the infrastructure needed for consistent, high-quality evidence collection across the state (e.g., supporting SANE programs). Because payment is not tied to police reporting, evidence can be collected and preserved even if a victim is initially undecided about pursuing legal action, keeping options open for the future. This standardized, funded approach strengthens the potential for holding offenders accountable through the legal system by ensuring valuable evidence isn’t lost due to cost concerns.
The statute incorporates provisions that enhance victim autonomy during a deeply disempowering experience. Decoupling state payment from the requirement to file a police report respects a victim’s individual timeline and decision-making process regarding legal action. Furthermore, giving victims explicit control over whether their insurance is billed (§ 609.35(b)) protects their privacy and empowers them to make informed choices about their personal information. These elements contribute to a more victim-centered response system, acknowledging the need for control and respect in the aftermath of trauma.
By designating the reimbursement requests and supporting documents submitted to the Office of Justice Programs as private data (§ 609.35(d)), the statute adds a layer of confidentiality protection. This helps ensure that sensitive information related to the victim and the circumstances of the exam is shielded from public disclosure through the state payment process. Maintaining privacy around these financial transactions helps protect victims from potential re-traumatization or unwanted exposure related to the assault, reinforcing the supportive intent of the law long after the exam itself is completed.
When a person has experienced criminal sexual conduct, understanding their rights regarding medical care is paramount. An attorney can clearly explain the provisions of Minnesota Statute § 609.35, ensuring the victim knows they are entitled to a medical forensic examination and associated immediate care at no personal cost if the assault occurred in Minnesota. The attorney can clarify that this right exists regardless of whether they choose to report the incident to law enforcement and explain their absolute right to control whether their insurance information is used for billing. This foundational knowledge empowers victims to confidently seek necessary care and assert their rights when interacting with healthcare providers.
Despite the clarity of § 609.35, billing errors can occur, and a victim might wrongly receive a bill for a covered forensic exam. This can be incredibly distressing. An attorney can intervene directly on the victim’s behalf, contacting the healthcare provider’s billing department to demand correction. By citing the specific requirements of the statute and the provider’s obligation to bill the Office of Justice Programs, the attorney can often resolve the issue quickly, relieving the victim of the burden and stress of dealing with the improper bill and ensuring the provider complies with Minnesota law. This advocacy protects the victim from financial harm stemming from the provider’s error.
The decision whether to authorize insurance billing involves privacy considerations. An attorney can help a victim weigh the implications. Authorizing insurance billing might lead to Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements being sent, potentially compromising privacy if mail or accounts are shared. Declining authorization ensures the state pays directly, enhancing privacy. An attorney can explain these nuances, confirm the provider gave the legally required disclosures before asking, and support the victim in making the choice that best aligns with their privacy needs and preferences, ensuring their statutory right to control this process is fully respected.
While § 609.35 aims for seamless state payment, disputes occasionally arise regarding eligibility (e.g., question about where the assault occurred) or whether specific services fall under the “associated costs” covered by the statute or the applicable payment cap. An attorney can help navigate these issues, potentially by gathering evidence to confirm the assault location or providing legal arguments about the scope of covered services based on the statute’s language and intent. While direct disputes often involve the provider and OJP, an attorney can advise the victim or assist the provider (with victim consent) in presenting information to ensure the victim ultimately benefits from the law as intended.
